<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tips on Digitising vinyl &#8211; from LP to MP3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/tips-on-digitising-vinyl-from-lp-to-mp3/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog</link>
	<description>Where I post music stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:22:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/tips-on-digitising-vinyl-from-lp-to-mp3/comment-page-1#comment-32319</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/?page_id=29#comment-32319</guid>
		<description>An good used turntable with a entry level Grado cartridge ($40) will give CDs a run for their money. I have a home audio CD recorder in my stereo system; I just put the record on and press record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An good used turntable with a entry level Grado cartridge ($40) will give CDs a run for their money. I have a home audio CD recorder in my stereo system; I just put the record on and press record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/tips-on-digitising-vinyl-from-lp-to-mp3/comment-page-1#comment-30714</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 12:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/?page_id=29#comment-30714</guid>
		<description>&quot;It has audiophile-quality vinyl mastering, but the usual over-compressed sound on CD.&quot;

I used to assume that vinyl would have to be more compressed than CD. I seem to remember reading an article on vinyl mastering that made the process sound quite horrific; reducing bass transients to stop the player&#039;s needle from jumping out of the groove, and having to reduce treble content to prevent the cutter&#039;s head from overheating, that sort of thing. Dynamic range had to be compressed to prevent quiet passages being buried in hiss and crackle - arbitrary mutilation of the recording in order to cater for the quirks of the medium, in other words.

The &quot;over-compressed&quot; sound of CD that you refer to is more a case of the expectation of the digital version being listened to by iPod-wearing youngsters on the bus, rather than a defect in CD itself. As you mention in another of your posts on audio quality, CDs from the 80s often sound better than more recent &#039;re-mastered&#039; ones. This is how it feels to me, I have to say, where older versions have more &#039;space&#039; in them. I am also convinced that the &quot;loudness wars&quot; are not only resulting in dynamic compression, but real distortion of the signal. The &#039;loudness&#039; of Radio 1 (during the day in particular?) is utterly, utterly ridiculous; I sometimes wonder if the DJs have any view on the amount of multilation of the music that goes on &#039;in their name&#039;, or if they are oblivious to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It has audiophile-quality vinyl mastering, but the usual over-compressed sound on CD.&#8221;</p>
<p>I used to assume that vinyl would have to be more compressed than CD. I seem to remember reading an article on vinyl mastering that made the process sound quite horrific; reducing bass transients to stop the player&#8217;s needle from jumping out of the groove, and having to reduce treble content to prevent the cutter&#8217;s head from overheating, that sort of thing. Dynamic range had to be compressed to prevent quiet passages being buried in hiss and crackle &#8211; arbitrary mutilation of the recording in order to cater for the quirks of the medium, in other words.</p>
<p>The &#8220;over-compressed&#8221; sound of CD that you refer to is more a case of the expectation of the digital version being listened to by iPod-wearing youngsters on the bus, rather than a defect in CD itself. As you mention in another of your posts on audio quality, CDs from the 80s often sound better than more recent &#8216;re-mastered&#8217; ones. This is how it feels to me, I have to say, where older versions have more &#8216;space&#8217; in them. I am also convinced that the &#8220;loudness wars&#8221; are not only resulting in dynamic compression, but real distortion of the signal. The &#8216;loudness&#8217; of Radio 1 (during the day in particular?) is utterly, utterly ridiculous; I sometimes wonder if the DJs have any view on the amount of multilation of the music that goes on &#8216;in their name&#8217;, or if they are oblivious to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

