<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tim's music blog &#187; reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/category/reviews/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog</link>
	<description>Where I post music stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 20:27:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Quadrophenia director&#8217;s cut</title>
		<link>http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2011-11-15-review-quadrophenia-directors-cut.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2011-11-15-review-quadrophenia-directors-cut.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 23:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the who]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quadrophenia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/?p=144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This might be my favourite album ever. It connects somehow, the frustration of My g-g-g-generation extended to an entire double album, played with the frenetic energy and genius of The Who, and intermingled with a dash of Pete Townshend’s mystical leanings. I am the sea. It is not only the music, the whole package was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This might be my favourite album ever.</p>
<p>It connects somehow, the frustration of My g-g-g-generation extended to an entire double album, played with the frenetic energy and genius of The Who, and intermingled with a dash of Pete Townshend’s mystical leanings. I am the sea.</p>
<p>It is not only the music, the whole package was perfect when it arrived in autumn 1973. The black and white cover with the scooter and the four faces of the band reflected in its mirrors, and a breathtakingly good series of monochrome photographs. If any record deserves a deluxe edition, this one does.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/quadbox.jpg"><img style="background-image: none; border-right-width: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="quadbox" border="0" alt="quadbox" src="http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/quadbox_thumb.jpg" width="244" height="244" /></a></p>
<p>And here it is – or is it? What we have is something half-way between the sumptuous, informative, historic collector’s edition which the album merits, and the kind of money grabbing release you get when some record company notices how much people are paying for boxed sets these days and says, “Quick, let’s get Quadrophenia out before the CD market disappears completely”.</p>
<p>Because there is a lot wrong with this release.</p>
<p>Still, time to stop rambling and tell you what you get. Within a very solid slipcase you will find a poster advertising the original double album (actually this is a fine reproduction and one of the better things here), a colour envelope holding various bits of memorabilia: reproductions of some of Townshend’s draft lyrics, a rather darkly reproduced colour photo of Jimmy (the central character) on a scooter, and a 7-inch single of 5.15 backed with the slightly rare track Water.</p>
<p>Then there is the main event: a 100-page hardback book of photos and an essay by Townshend, within which nestle the original double CD, a DVD with 8 tracks remixed for 5.1 surround sound, and two CDs of Townshend’s demos for the album.</p>
<p>The book is certainly nice to have, though bear in mind that the original album came with a 46 page insert which is all included in the book, so that accounts for nearly a quarter of it. I am also upset to report that the quality of those wonderful photographs is poor; I was really hoping that I would get better copies than those in my falling-apart LP but in fact these are noticeably worse; they have that grainy look you get when photos are reprinted from a print rather than from the originals.</p>
<p>Still, the *other* photos in the book are nicely reproduced and the essay is fascinating if you love Quadrophenia half as much as I do. Townshend recounts how he came up with the story that is printed in the front cover of the LP (and also here), when remembering how he slept under Brighton pier once “after a riotous night at the Aquarium ballroom.” He also describes how the album came together, how it was recorded, and adds notes on the songs and demos.</p>
<p>If you are a fan, you will definitely want to hear the demos too. They form a sort-of alternate version of the album, lacking the Who’s energy but with its own appeal. There are also songs here that are not on the album, and others that did not show up until the soundtrack of the Quadrophenia film. Some of the songs have overdubs which I personally would rather had been omitted.</p>
<p>The 5.1 mix is enjoyable too. This album is ideal for surround sound, especially at those moments when sea noises swirl around.</p>
<p>It’s curious though that only 8 tracks have been mixed to 5.1. Why? But the rest of 5.1 Quadrophenia is not the only thing missing.</p>
<p>The important thing to realise is that this is Townshend’s deluxe box, rather than The Who’s deluxe box. I have not spotted any contribution to the package from Roger Daltrey, despite his massive contribution to the quality of the album, nor even any attempt to collect existing quotes from the two members of the band who are no longer with us, Keith Moon and John Entwistle. There are no outtakes from band sessions, nor are there any live tracks from when Quadrophenia was performed live back in the day; yes I realise that the concerts at the time had some problems but I would still love to hear how they sounded.</p>
<p>Quadrophenia was remixed in 1996 and it is the remix that is offered here (it sounds the same as before), but for completeness I would have liked both mixes to be included, in line with what has been done in deluxe boxes for other classic albums such as Jethro Tull’s Aqualung and King Crimson’s In the Court of. To my mind the original mix is still important, the Quadrophenia that is as I first heard it in the seventies.</p>
<p>So this is a frustrating production, much less than it should be; but then again frustration is what Quadrophenia is all about so that is curiously fitting. </p>
<p>Fans will still want this package, hard though it is to justify the cost – especially when you consider that 11 of the 25 demos are also on the Deluxe 2-CD set at one sixth of the price, and that even more memorabilia is also available online at the new <a href="http://www.quadropheniaofficial.com/q-cloud/" target="_blank">Q-Cloud</a> site, accessible to anyone who has purchased or ripped the CD.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/image.png"><img style="background-image: none; border-right-width: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="image" border="0" alt="image" src="http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/image_thumb.png" width="244" height="202" /></a></p>
<p>And I suppose when and if the full 5.1 release is done eventually we will be asked to pay again.</p>
<p> <iframe style="width: 120px; height: 240px" marginheight="0" src="http://rcm-uk.amazon.co.uk/e/cm?lt1=_blank&amp;bc1=000000&amp;IS2=1&amp;bg1=FFFFFF&amp;fc1=000000&amp;lc1=0000FF&amp;t=onlyconnectsyste&amp;o=2&amp;p=8&amp;l=as4&amp;m=amazon&amp;f=ifr&amp;ref=ss_til&amp;asins=B005D9B26E" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>&#160;<iframe style="width: 120px; height: 240px" marginheight="0" src="http://rcm-uk.amazon.co.uk/e/cm?lt1=_blank&amp;bc1=000000&amp;IS2=1&amp;bg1=FFFFFF&amp;fc1=000000&amp;lc1=0000FF&amp;t=onlyconnectsyste&amp;o=2&amp;p=8&amp;l=as4&amp;m=amazon&amp;f=ifr&amp;ref=ss_til&amp;asins=B005DMNS4A" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>&#160; <iframe style="width: 120px; height: 240px" marginheight="0" src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?lt1=_blank&amp;bc1=000000&amp;IS2=1&amp;bg1=FFFFFF&amp;fc1=000000&amp;lc1=0000FF&amp;t=itwriting-20&amp;o=1&amp;p=8&amp;l=as4&amp;m=amazon&amp;f=ifr&amp;ref=ss_til&amp;asins=B005D9B26E" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>&#160;<iframe style="width: 120px; height: 240px" marginheight="0" src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?lt1=_blank&amp;bc1=000000&amp;IS2=1&amp;bg1=FFFFFF&amp;fc1=000000&amp;lc1=0000FF&amp;t=itwriting-20&amp;o=1&amp;p=8&amp;l=as4&amp;m=amazon&amp;f=ifr&amp;ref=ss_til&amp;asins=B005DMNS4A" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2011-11-15-review-quadrophenia-directors-cut.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: The Bowie Variations by Mike Garson</title>
		<link>http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2011-10-15-review-the-bowie-variations-by-mike-garson.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2011-10-15-review-the-bowie-variations-by-mike-garson.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 09:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[david bowie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mike garson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2011-10-15-review-the-bowie-variations-by-mike-garson.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a big David Bowie fan (as I guess will be most purchasers of this CD) and first noticed Garson&#8217;s work in the magnificent, edgy accompaniment to Aladdin Sane &#8211; specifically, that track, though he makes a great contribution to the entire album. Garson played on many of Bowie&#8217;s albums, from Ziggy Stardust through [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a big David Bowie fan (as I guess will be most purchasers of this CD) and first noticed Garson&#8217;s work in the magnificent, edgy accompaniment to Aladdin Sane &#8211; specifically, that track, though he makes a great contribution to the entire album.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/image.png"><img style="background-image: none; border-right-width: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="image" border="0" alt="image" src="http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/image_thumb.png" width="244" height="229" /></a></p>
<p>Garson played on many of Bowie&#8217;s albums, from Ziggy Stardust through to Reality, and made a key contribution to the sound. I particularly like his work on David Live, Bowie&#8217;s live album from 1974, but it is consistently good, which is no doubt why he remained part of the band.</p>
<p>This CD is I guess a kind of tribute and reflection on his work with Bowie; one of the tracks is actually called Tribute to David. Garson performs solo piano variations on a number of Bowie&#8217;s songs. Note that these are variations, not performances as such, and since Garson is a creative jazz pianist they really are variations; in some cases it takes a while to work out what the song is, even if you know Bowie&#8217;s version well.</p>
<p>The performance is excellent, and the recording quality is outstanding. Nevertheless I was a little disappointed; found it a little too mellow and smooth for my taste. Perhaps Garson needs the interplay with the band to spark that edgy quality that I love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2011-10-15-review-the-bowie-variations-by-mike-garson.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A classic album you may have missed</title>
		<link>http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2011-07-31-a-classic-album-you-may-have-missed.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2011-07-31-a-classic-album-you-may-have-missed.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 09:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solomon burke]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2011-07-31-a-classic-album-you-may-have-missed.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Soul is not really my kind of music. Maybe it should be. I discovered this album back in the Eighties when I heard it playing in a shop. The title track, a cover of Sam Cooke’s song, is astonishing. The pace is slower than the original. The song builds from a quiet, haunting opening into [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soul is not really my kind of music. Maybe it should be. I discovered this album back in the Eighties when I heard it playing in a shop.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/image1.png"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="image" border="0" alt="image" src="http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/image_thumb.png" width="244" height="244" /></a></p>
<p>The title track, a cover of Sam Cooke’s song, is astonishing. The pace is slower than the original. The song builds from a quiet, haunting opening into a heartfelt, almost prayerful appeal. Burke’s effortless vocals are melodic yet powerful; it sounds real, even to the voiceover at the end.</p>
<blockquote><p>It’s been a long long long time comin’, but a change is gonna come, a change has got to come.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>There is nothing quite like it elsewhere on the album, but plenty to enjoy, from the soulful <em>Love buys Love</em> to fun tracks like <em>Don’t Tell me what a man won’t do for a woman</em>.</p>
<p>The sound is immaculate, and the accompaniment, including the “Windfall Horns” (Bill Samuels, Terry Tullos and Ernie Gautreau), is nearly perfect.</p>
<p>It is the sound of New Orleans and was recorded at Studio Solo in Slidell, Louisiana.</p>
<p>Recommended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2011-07-31-a-classic-album-you-may-have-missed.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SHM-SACD &#8211; super-expensive, but how super is the sound?</title>
		<link>http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2010-09-17-shm-sacd-super-expensive-but-how-super-is-the-sound.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2010-09-17-shm-sacd-super-expensive-but-how-super-is-the-sound.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 21:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the who]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sacd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shm-sacd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[who's next]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2010-09-17-shm-sacd-super-expensive-but-how-super-is-the-sound.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problems facing the music industry are well-known: the CD market is fast disappearing thanks to digital downloads, both legal and illegal, and income gained from downloads does not look likely to match that lost from CD. But what about the niche market for recordings of superior quality? Universal Music Japan has come up with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problems facing the music industry are well-known: the CD market is fast disappearing thanks to digital downloads, both legal and illegal, and income gained from downloads does not look likely to match that lost from CD. But what about the niche market for recordings of superior quality? Universal Music Japan has come up with a product that combines several ideas. The first is SHM, or Super High Material, first used for CDs with the claim that, despite being a digital medium, players would extract better quality sound from CDs made with it. The next theory is that the high-resolution SACD format will play back more accurately if the disk only includes a stereo layer, rather than including stereo, multi-channel, and standard CD layers. The result is a new SHM-SACD series, remasters of classic titles at premium prices.</p>
<p>The source used for these titles varies. Some are new DSD (Direct Stream Digital, the digital format of SACD) master made from copy master tapes held in Japan. Some are re-issues of existing DSD transfers. Some are newly mastered from original master tapes.</p>
<p>Who’s Next is apparently in this last group, newly mastered from the original tapes. It is said to have been done as straight as possible,&#160; with no equalization or compression, and is the original mix.</p>
<p>This is a favourite of mine, so I bought a copy. It comes in typically over-the-top Japanese packaging, SHM-SACD in a plastic film sleeve inside a paper sleeve inside a card sleeve. There is a fold-out cover with a photograph I’ve not seen before, liner notes, obi, and a card to return with suggestions for future titles.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/image.png"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="image" border="0" alt="image" src="http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/image_thumb.png" width="244" height="193" /></a>&#160;</p>
<p>I played the disk and compared it to my existing CD. In fact, I must confess, I have several copies. Who’s Next has been issued many times, and the most obsessive fans know that the best CD is an early one mastered by Steve Hoffman and made in Japan for the US market. He has written about how he mastered it on <a href="http://www.stevehoffman.tv/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2" target="_blank">his forum</a>, using as little processing as possible though he did add some modest EQ. </p>
<p>Both the Hoffman CD and the new SACD sound very good. I am not quite sure which I prefer, but it may be the SACD which sounds exceptionally clean and lets you easily follow John Entwistle’s fantastic bass lines. Or it might be the Hoffman CD which is remarkably crisp and muscular. There is an odd problem with the SACD, which is that the last track is noticeably louder than the others. It was recorded separately, but that seems no reason not to match the volume.</p>
<p>So do I recommend the SACD, and by extension, the new SHM-SACD range? Well, I am all in favour of mastering CDs with full dynamic range, no attempt at noise reduction, minimal processing, and without the excessive compression that mars so many new releases. The Who’s Next title shows what great results you an get with this approach.</p>
<p>That said, it is tragic to have these high quality new remasters restricted to a niche format at an excessive price. The SHM thing I suspect is nonsense; if CDs and SACDs made with ordinary material did not work properly, we would have noticed it years ago. The advantages of SACD are doubtful too, certainly for stereo, because the limitations of human hearing make the extended frequency response pointless. I have <a href="http://www.itwriting.com/blog/articles/is-high-resolution-audio-like-sacd-audibly-better-than-than-cd" target="_blank">researched this</a> to the best of my ability and while I don’t know for sure that high-resolution formats like SACD are completely pointless, it does seem that standard CDs can sound either the same or nearly the same when the audible difference is put to the test with any rigour.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/image1.png"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="image" border="0" alt="image" src="http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/image_thumb1.png" width="244" height="237" /></a> </p>
<p>The SACD format is also rather inconvenient. You cannot easily rip to to a music server, you have to make a further digital copy from the analogue output of the SACD player, and then rip the copy, probably breaching your license in doing so, and potentially degrading the sound quality.</p>
<p>I also compared stereo-only and hybrid SACDs using Bob Dylan’s Blonde on Blonde, which was issued in both guises. The stereo version sounds identical.</p>
<p>Still, even you are paying for a certain amount of stuff and nonsense, you are also getting SACDs that genuinely sound good, at least in the case of Who’s Next. Perhaps it could even be worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2010-09-17-shm-sacd-super-expensive-but-how-super-is-the-sound.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: The Who &#8211; Greatest Hits Live</title>
		<link>http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2010-04-15-review-the-who-greatest-hits-live.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2010-04-15-review-the-who-greatest-hits-live.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the who]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2010-04-15-review-the-who-greatest-hits-live.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Who at its best is the equal of any live band ever, so the new double CD Greatest Hits Live has plenty of potential. On the other hand, cherry-picking from concerts over a 42-year period (1965 to 2007) is unlikely to offer the coherence or adrenalin rush of a single concert &#8211; get the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Who at its best is the equal of any live band ever, so the new double CD Greatest Hits Live has plenty of potential. On the other hand, cherry-picking from concerts over a 42-year period (1965 to 2007) is unlikely to offer the coherence or adrenalin rush of a single concert &#8211; get the sublime Live At Leeds in the unlikely event you have not heard it yet &#8211; and much of this material has appeared before, especially if you snagged the fanclub-only release View from a Backstage Pass.</p>
<p>The first CD here covers the original band including the late, great Keith Moon. Not a bad track here, though personally even by 1976 there was some decline in the band&#8217;s live performance in my opinion. </p>
<p>The CD does not present the songs chronological order which seems odd to me. I&#8217;ve sorted them for the list below. Great to have the songs from Hull, the day after the famous Leeds gig. In detail:</p>
<p><strong>BBC Session 1965      <br /></strong>My Generation</p>
<p><strong>Leeds 14 Feb 1970</strong>     <br />Magic Bus </p>
<p><strong>Hull 15 Feb 1970</strong>     <br />Happy Jack     <br />I&#8217;m a Boy</p>
<p><strong>San Francisco 12 Dec 1971</strong>     <br />I Can&#8217;t Explain     <br />Substitute     <br />Behind Blue Eyes </p>
<p><strong>Largo 6 Dec 1973</strong>     <br />5.15     <br />Won&#8217;t Get Fooled Again</p>
<p><strong>Charlton Athletic FC, 18 May 1974</strong>     <br />Naked Eye/Let&#8217;s See Action/My Generation</p>
<p><strong>Swansea, 12 June 1976</strong>     <br />Pinball Wizard     <br />I&#8217;m Free     <br />Squeezebox</p>
<p>CD2 on the other hand starts 15 years later. The first part is a good chunk of a 1989 concert from a tour which honestly was not one of The Who&#8217;s best. But it is still The Who and worth hearing. Then we get a scattering of tracks from more recent concerts, including a fine Real Me from Watford in 2002 and Eminence Front from Brisbane last year. Overall though, it&#8217;s not a particularly good representation of the best latter-day Who. In fact, I&#8217;d rather have had the entire Watford concert. In detail: </p>
<p><strong>Los Angeles, 24 August 1989</strong>     <br />I can see for miles     <br />Join Together     <br />Love Reign O&#8217;er Me     <br />Baba O&#8217;Riley     <br />Who Are You</p>
<p><strong>Watford 31 Jan 2002</strong>     <br />The Real Me </p>
<p><strong>Royal Albert Hall, London, 7 Feb 2002</strong>     <br />The Kids are Alright </p>
<p><strong>New York, 11 March 2007</strong>     <br />A man in a purple dress </p>
<p><strong>Brisbane, 24 March 2009</strong>     <br />Eminence Front </p>
<p>Overall, enjoyable but not a very satisfactory release. I&#8217;d recommend the At Kilburn 1977 [DVD] [2008, which also includes a concert at Coliseum 1969, ahead of this &#8211; the Coliseum concert on that is just fantastic. Greatest Hits Live on the other hand is mainly for Who enthusiasts. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2010-04-15-review-the-who-greatest-hits-live.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Broken bells</title>
		<link>http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2010-04-02-review-broken-bells.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2010-04-02-review-broken-bells.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 09:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broken bells]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2010-04-02-review-broken-bells.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve listened to this CD by James Mercer (ex The Shins) and Brian Burton (half of Gnarls Barkley) numerous times and can&#8217;t shake off the feeling that this could have been much better. That said, it&#8217;s good in lots of ways. The sounds are inventive, the melodies are strong, the talent is obvious. The sound [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve listened to this CD by James Mercer (ex The Shins) and Brian Burton (half of Gnarls Barkley) numerous times and can&#8217;t shake off the feeling that this could have been much better. That said, it&#8217;s good in lots of ways. The sounds are inventive, the melodies are strong, the talent is obvious. </p>
<p>The sound is a little dated, though I&#8217;m guessing that&#8217;s deliberate; there are echoes of eighties-style new romantic crooning plus electronica.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s missing then? Well, one of the songs is called &quot;Sailing to nowhere&quot; which sums it up nicely. The CD is lacking in passion or any real sense of direction.</p>
<p>If you like what James Mercer and Danger Mouse have done before, then you&#8217;ll likely enjoy this, though I doubt you will find it their best work. For others, there&#8217;s little compelling reason to grab this CD, though it passes pleasantly enough</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2010-04-02-review-broken-bells.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A few observations on King Crimson: The Court of the Crimson King</title>
		<link>http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2009-11-29-a-few-observations-on-king-crimson-the-court-of-the-crimson-king.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2009-11-29-a-few-observations-on-king-crimson-the-court-of-the-crimson-king.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[king crimson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2009-11-29-a-few-observations-on-king-crimson-the-court-of-the-crimson-king.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DGM has released a magnificent CD/DVD box set reissue of King Crimson’s classic debut, The Court of the Crimson King. Maybe I will write more about this when I have listened to it properly, but in the meantime a few observations. This is completist heaven. There is always argument about whether reissues should feature the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DGM has released a magnificent CD/DVD box set reissue of King Crimson’s classic debut, The Court of the Crimson King.</p>
<p>Maybe I will write more about this when I have listened to it properly, but in the meantime a few observations.</p>
<p>This is completist heaven. There is always argument about whether reissues should feature the original mix (for authenticity) or a new mix (to benefit from modern noise-free mixing techniques). The makers of the recent Genesis boxes contentiously chose the latter. DGM by contrast offers both. </p>
<p>Not only that, you get several versions of both. You get a new 2009 mix in CD and several DVD versions – several DVD versions because only DVD audio players can cope with the highest resolution, and most people only have DVD video players – so we end up with a 2009 surround mix in two audio versions; a 2009 stereo mix in two audio versions; and the original mix as mastered in 2004 in two audio versions.</p>
<p>It doesn’t stop there. We also get a needledrop from the first pressing of the UK vinyl release on Island Records; and an alternate take version of the album with different performances, such as an instrumental-only 21st Century Schizoid Man.</p>
<p>Then there are the other extras: the full version of Moonchild; a live concert from 1969 (Hyde Park, July 5th combined with Filmore East, New York in November); a mono album mix issued for US radio.</p>
<p>If 5 CDs and a DVD aren’t enough for you, you can also enjoy the LP-size box, which enables the original artwork to be printed at its proper size, and inserts including a well-written 24 page booklet, two photographs from the era, and rattling aimlessly about inside, two little badges.</p>
<p>But I promised some observations, not just a description. I love the album; never be deceived by the opening clamour of 21st Century Schizoid Man, this is thoughtful music, not a mindless thrash. It was extraordinary hearing it for the first time; I’m not sure when that was for me – not 1969, but a couple of years later. It might have been on that wonderful Island Records sampler, Nice Enough to Eat, which I listened to in 1972 or thereabouts. If any album deserves this kind of treatment, this one does.</p>
<p>It was particularly thoughtful of the compilers to include the vinyl needledrop and the full-size artwork. Still &#8230; as it happens I have the record, not the first pressing, but an early ILPS, 4U matrix if you really want to know.</p>
<p>I played the record and then the CD needledrop. You know what? My record sounds better to my ears. Oddly, on the “declicked” needledrop you can easily hear pre-echo of the opening salvo of Schizoid, where it goes from very quiet to very loud. This is a vinyl flaw, where a quiet groove picks up a faint echo of the louder groove which follows it. My cut doesn’t have that, at least not audibly. It also sounds richer, more open, more dynamic.</p>
<p>Another thing I noticed: the artwork. Honestly, you <strong>have</strong> to see an early pressing of the original LP to appreciate this very striking image. The definition is much better, the colours more vibrant, those eyes – they stare manically out of the original, in the new print they are muted.</p>
<p>I’m guessing that they didn’t manage to get hold of the original artwork, and that what we have here is a print of a print.</p>
<p>Never mind. If you love this album, get the box; it is fantastic. You can get it from <a href="http://www.burningshed.com/store/kingcrimson/collection/313/1682/" target="_blank">burning shed</a>.</p>
<div style="padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: none; padding-top: 0px" id="scid:0767317B-992E-4b12-91E0-4F059A8CECA8:ecb046c8-4e90-4ea7-b856-26d3b0e502e6" class="wlWriterEditableSmartContent">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tags/king+crimson" rel="tag">king crimson</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/court+of+the+crimson+king" rel="tag">court of the crimson king</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2009-11-29-a-few-observations-on-king-crimson-the-court-of-the-crimson-king.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Animal Kingdom &#8211; signs and wonders</title>
		<link>http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2009-08-27-review-animal-kingdom-signs-and-wonders.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2009-08-27-review-animal-kingdom-signs-and-wonders.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2009-08-27-review-animal-kingdom-signs-and-wonders.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I reviewed this on Amazon and called it “Quirky, mystical and tuneful”. It’s the debut album from a promising London band, though this was recorded in Seattle. Animal Kingdom has been quietly building a fan base, playing support to the likes of Snow Patrol as well as their own club gigs. The band has already [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I reviewed this on Amazon and called it “Quirky, mystical and tuneful”. It’s the debut album from a promising London band, though this was recorded in Seattle. Animal Kingdom has been quietly building a fan base, playing support to the likes of Snow Patrol as well as their own club gigs.</p>
<p>The band has already released two singles, both excellent: the affecting, ethereal Chalk Stars, and the pulsating Tin Man, a love song for the electronic age. Both songs feature here, along with the new single Signs and Wonders which is not quite the equal of the first two, but still a catchy number. </p>
<p>What you get is Richard Sauberlich&#8217;s delicate, keening vocals; lyrics which are quirky and mystical, and music that is pacey and tuneful. The band cite a broad range of influences from Arcade Fire, to Dylan, to the Cure, to Massive Attack, all of which can be heard in snatches here and there. </p>
<p>As you might expect from an album called Signs and Wonders, there&#8217;s plenty of biblical imagery: Two by Two (think Noah&#8217;s Ark), Walls of Jericho, Mephistopheles, and more. </p>
<p>It all passes pleasantly enough, and that in a way is the problem. Could there be a tension between the band&#8217;s darker instincts and its pursuit of that elusive mass market? At times this CD is just a bit too pretty and poppy. By contrast, my favourite track is the swirling Mephistopheles, declaimed rather than sung, and featuring disturbing, evocative imagery against a pounding but delicate keyboard background. </p>
<p>Not perfect then; but Signs and Wonders is well worth it for its best moments, which are superb. Catch Animal Kingdom live if you can, and watch this space. </p>
<p>Animal Kingdom is Richard Sauberlich (vocals, guitar, piano), Wayne Yardley (guitar), Hamish Crombie (bass) and Geoff Lea (drums).</p>
<p> <iframe style="width: 120px; height: 240px" marginheight="0" src="http://rcm-uk.amazon.co.uk/e/cm?t=onlyconnectsyste&amp;o=2&amp;p=8&amp;l=as1&amp;asins=B002KMK35I&amp;fc1=000000&amp;IS2=1&amp;lt1=_blank&amp;m=amazon&amp;lc1=0000FF&amp;bc1=000000&amp;bg1=FFFFFF&amp;f=ifr" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2009-08-27-review-animal-kingdom-signs-and-wonders.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Here comes the Future by the Honeydrips</title>
		<link>http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2009-08-24-review-here-comes-the-future-by-the-honeydrips.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2009-08-24-review-here-comes-the-future-by-the-honeydrips.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 06:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2009-08-24-review-here-comes-the-future-by-the-honeydrips.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Honeydrips is Mikael Carlsson, formerly in the Swedish band Dorotea. This is a beautiful album &#8211; the band&#8217;s sole release, as far as I know &#8211; combining Carlsson&#8217;s haunting, graceful vocals with electro-funk backing that echoes (more than echoes, in places) bands such as New Order and its predecessor Joy Division, though it is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Honeydrips is Mikael Carlsson, formerly in the Swedish band Dorotea. This is a beautiful album &#8211; the band&#8217;s sole release, as far as I know &#8211; combining Carlsson&#8217;s haunting, graceful vocals with electro-funk backing that echoes (more than echoes, in places) bands such as New Order and its predecessor Joy Division, though it is generally lighter in mood.</p>
<p>The album opens with some twanging guitar and the words “Last night I had the strangest dream”, setting a surreal atmosphere that persists throughout.</p>
<p>Favourite track: It was a sunny Summer day, a bland title disguising a cascade of melody, a touch of Carribean percussion, and bittersweet lyrics &quot;it was a sunny summer day, when all my hope drifted away&#8230;&quot;</p>
<p>&quot;I know a place where you and I could go, if you&#8217;re up for trying something new&quot; (from the second track) &#8211; give it a go. You don’t even need to buy it; try it on <a href="http://www.spotify.com/" target="_blank">Spotify</a>, which is where I discovered it, though I went on to buy the CD from the record label’s site:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sincerelyyours.se/boutique.php">http://www.sincerelyyours.se/boutique.php</a></p>
<p>proving that online music services really can result in a purchase.</p>
<div style="padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: none; padding-top: 0px" id="scid:0767317B-992E-4b12-91E0-4F059A8CECA8:dcfb9426-620b-4fac-b2ce-ae44f17cfcf9" class="wlWriterEditableSmartContent">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tags/honeydrips" rel="tag">honeydrips</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/mikael+carlsson" rel="tag">mikael carlsson</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/new+order" rel="tag">new order</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/joy+division" rel="tag">joy division</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taggedtalk.com/blog/2009-08-24-review-here-comes-the-future-by-the-honeydrips.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

